Links to the readings can be found in our on-line reader.
Q1, Q2, Q3, ... are quizzes;
#A, #B, #C, ... are written assignments.
ECS 188 – Ethics in an Age of Technology – Fall 2011 – Phil Rogaway |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Class | How we spent the class: | For today you need to: | Comments: |
#01 R 9/22 | Overview. Watched Dekalog 1, by K. Kieslowski. | Surprise! Nothing due on our first day of class. | See Tuesday’s slot for assignments due Tuesday, etc. |
#02 T 9/27 | Q1. Discussed Dekalog and started the discussion of Barbour. | Read the course information sheet.
Read Views of Technology
by I. Barbour.
#A: Write a 1-2 page analysis answering Why did Kieslowski kill Pavel? |
More by Kieslowski: Blue, Red, The Double Life of Veronique |
#03 R 9/29 | Q2. Continued our discussion of Barbour and then discussed Heilbroner. | Read Do Machines Make History by R. Heilbroner. | Not required: Marx and the Machine by D. MacKenzie.
NB: Smith, Ch. |
#04 T 10/4 | Q3. Discussed writing. Discussed Winner and Joerges articles. | Read Do Artifacts Have Politics? by L. Winner. Wait a day or two and read Do Politics Have Artefacts? by B. Joerges. | UC-Blackwelder Tomato Harvester |
#05 R 10/6 | Q4. Discussed the Layard reading. | Read the transcript of the first two lectures (two pdf files) by R. Layard | Layard’s well-known book. |
#06 T 10/11 | Q5. Discussed first two sections in Johnson: ethical relativism and utilitarianism. | Read Philosophical Ethics by D. Johnson | You might enjoy Scientist Finds the Beginnings of Morality in Primate Behavior by N. Wade (NY Times, 2007). |
#07 R 10/13 | Discussed rest of Johnson. Some discussion of Cohen. Sect 2: some ethical “puzzles”. | Read Oldest Living Tree Tells All by M. Cohen.
#B: Write a brief analysis on the reading, asking yourself if/how it relates to conventional moral philosophy as summarized in your prior reading by Johnson |
Kant and animal torture: short or long |
#08 T 10/18 | Q6. Discussed the Cohen article and then the first half of the Jonas reading. | #C:
Milestone #1 due.
Read The Altered Nature of Human Action by
H. Jonas. #D: Collect quotes from the Jonas reading. |
Helpful vocabulary for the Jonas reading. |
#09 R 10/20 | Q7. Finished Jonas discussion. Discussed Joy reading. | Read Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us by B. Joy. | R. Kurzweil response | .
#10 T 10/25 | Watched An Inconvenient Truth (by Al Gore) | Read This was a Crime by Mark Hersgaard. | Perhaps next year: The Age of Stupid instead |
#11 R 10/27 | Q8. Saw J. Hansen interview. Discussed the essay question. | Read Environmental Ethics by A. Brennan and Y. Lo. #E: Write a short essay (click for topic). | A really dystopian end: the Runaway Greenhouse Effect |
#12 T 11/1 | Q9. Discussed the McLuhan interview. Saw some short video(s). | Read an interview
of M. McLuhan #F: Prepare questions on the reading |
Vocabulary for today’s reading |
#13 R 11/3 | Discussed the Friedman reading. Saw the first part of Why We Fight by E. Jarecki | Read The Lexus and the Olive Tree by T. Friedman | Video: Why We Fight (watched until 59:00) |
#14 T 11/8 | Q10. Saw the rest of Why We Fight. Discussed film and readings. | Read
The Lexus and the Olive Tree Revisited by
H. Chang.
Read President Eisenhower’s Farewell Address. |
YouTube: Eisenhower Farewell Address (Full) |
#15 R 11/10 | Q11. Discussed the Schmidt reading. | Read Disciplined Minds by J. Schmidt | . |
#16 T 11/15 | Discussed the Mehta reading. Watched The Corporation, Chapts 1-10. | #G: Milestone #2 due.
Read Bhopal Lives by S. Mehta. |
Bhopal update: 2004 and 2010 |
#17 R 11/17 | Q12. I presented a talk about giving talks. Discussed The Corporation, and then the codes of ethics. | Watched the rest of The Corporation (start: Ch. 11) Read the ACM Code of Ethics. Read the IEEE Code of Ethics. Read Some Pledges for Scientists and Engineers. |
You might want to read The Fifty-Nine-Story Crisis (which I often assign) to see that not everyone behaves badly... |
#18 T 11/22 | We discussed the pepper-spray attack and the study questions related to it |
#H: Pepper-spray assignment.
#I: Each person (not each group) should email to the authors
careful comments on the Milestone 2 you received, copying me. | Question H.12: why can this emerge from Physics, while the Comp Sci could not agree to use the word apologize, let alone assert that the chancellor is responsible? |
#xx R 11/24 | No class — it’s Thanksgiving | No class | No class |
#19 T 11/29 | Presentation Day #1 (four groups) | Section 1 read: p101, p102, p103, p104 Section 2 read: p201, p202, p203, p204 |
. |
#20 R 12/1 | Presentation Day #2 (four groups) |
Section 1 read: p105, p106, p107, p108 Section 2 read: p205, p206, p207, p208 #J: complete the paper evaluation (print twice) (omit your own, if you’re presenting). |
. |
#xx T 12/6 | Final for Sect 1 (8-10 am) Presentation Day #3 |
Read p109, p110, p111 #K: complete the paper evaluation (print twice) (omit your own, if you’re presenting). |
Bronowski video. |
#xx W 12/7 | Final for Sect 2 (6-8 pm) Presentation Day #3 |
Read p209, p210, p211 #K: complete the paper evaluation (print twice) (omit your own, if you’re presenting). |
Bronowski video. |